Useful post on thinking about the first stage of reviewing an article for a journal
So you’ve just got an article to review and you’re not sure how to go about it.
Before even beginning to read, the first thing to get clear about is the STANCE you have to take as a reviewer.
Once you’ve clicked ‘agree to review’ and you have the article in your inbox, you now have to put aside all of those debates about whether blind peer refereeing is a good or a bad thing, or whether it’s here to stay or on the way out. You’ve got the article and you need to do a good job. The author(s) has spent a piece of their life writing it, they have put their faith in the reviewing system – that’s you – and there is probably a lot riding on whether it gets published.
The job of reviewing is about deciding whether the paper is of sufficient quality to be…
View original post 1,179 more words